An unreasonable decision is one that is not supported by any reasons that can bear a somewhat probing examination. A decision will be unreasonable "only if there is no line of analysis within the given reasons that could reasonably lead the tribunal from the evidence before it to the conclusion at which it arrived". A decision may satisfy this standard of review if supported by a tenable explanation, even if that explanation is not one that a reviewing court finds compelling. See: Law Society of New Brunswick v. Ryan, 2003 SCC 20 (CanLII), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 247 at paragraph 55.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.