How have courts interpreted the implied undertaking in questioning in other child welfare cases?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from P.L. v. Alberta, 2012 ABQB 309 (CanLII):

The Plaintiff cites Cheyne v. Alberta, 2003 ABQB 244, in support of her application to lift the implied undertaking with respect to records and information given in questioning in other child welfare-related lawsuits against the Province.

Other Questions


In what circumstances will a court interpret a clause in a child support agreement to the benefit of the child? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the implied undertaking of an implied undertaking apply to the use of a searchable searchable database? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there any case law in which a child has been awarded under Schedule C of the Child Support Guidelines? (Alberta, Canada)
In an application for a writ of habeas corpus, is the court bound by virtue of the fact that the court has granted custody of a child in a custody dispute? (Alberta, Canada)
If a child objects to return to the parent that has abducted or wrongfully retained the child, does the child's desire to remain with the parent be considered an acceptable reason for objection? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the implied undertaking as a legal obligation to the court? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the Charter and the role of the courts? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a court impute income under section 19(1)(a) of the Child Support Guidelines where the payor has pursued a deliberate course of conduct for the purpose of evading child support obligations? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts in the United States and Canada interpreted the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of a motion for summary judgment? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a court order all court-ordered sales of a personal injury property be exempt from all court ordered sales? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.