Does a partial privative clause in a medical malpractice case impart only the protection of full privative protection?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Brandt Tractor Ltd. v. Pardee Equipment Employees Association, 2006 ABQB 327 (CanLII):
A similar clause was found to impart only the protection of a partial privative clause in Calgary Health Region v. United Nurses of Alberta, Local 95 [2005] A.J. No. 1675.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts treated the word "medical services" in a medical malpractice case? (Alberta, Canada)
In a medical malpractice case, can a medical professional become an insurer? (Alberta, Canada)
Is it appropriate for a medical professional to be considered a non-treating physician in a medical malpractice case? (Alberta, Canada)
What are the costs of a claim for malpractice brought by a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on the right of a medical professional to present new evidence at a medical malpractice hearing? (Alberta, Canada)
In a medical malpractice case, is a doctor permitted to refer to a patient’s medical chart containing information that is not relevant to the patient? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the current state of the law in Canada on medical malpractice? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the burden of proving consent in medical malpractice cases? (Alberta, Canada)
How has the material contribution test been interpreted in medical malpractice cases? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test to be applied in the resolution of a medical malpractice case? (Alberta, Canada)
