Does the Agnew-Surpass and the Grewal cases apply?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Nesbitt Thomson Deacon Inc. v. Everett, 1989 CanLII 2763 (BC CA):

The Agnew-Surpass and the Grewal cases do not apply here for two reasons. The first is that in each case - as in Wood v. Luscombe, [1966] 1 Q.B. 169, [1965] 3 W.L.R. 998, [1964] 3 All E.R. 972 - the res, the thing actually and directly in dispute, had already been adjudicated upon by a competent court and the same evidence was involved.

Other Questions


In a Workers’s Compensation Appeal Tribunal case, is there any case law that supports the argument that there is no case law in favour of a claim under the Employment Benefits Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the case law on the re-opening of a plaintiff’s case in a civil case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the principle of unjust enrichment apply to family law cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law or case law supporting the use of historical income figures for purposes of determining the value of individual income? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the case law in favour of the Court of Appeal in the case of the Supreme Court of Canada's most senior judge in the matter of personal injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law or case law in which an appeal from a decision refusing approval of an infant settlement is successful? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the entire agreement clause in a medical malpractice case apply to all medical malpractices? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for applying the rule of common law in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the principle against self-incrimination apply to a witness in a criminal case? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will Rule 30 of the Rules of Civil Procedure apply in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.