What is the test for reviewable decisions of administrative tribunals?
Canada (Federal), Canada
The following excerpt is from Rodriguez Reyna v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2008 FC 1044 (CanLII):
Decisions of administrative tribunals are now reviewable against two standards: correctness and reasonableness. Courts must show deference to the decisions of specialized administrative tribunals, which have a certain expertise in matters within their jurisdiction (see Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9 (Dunsmuir).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for reviewability of a decision by an administrative tribunal on a question of credibility? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
When a hearing officer disagrees with a decision made by the reviewing officer on the issues with which he disagreed with the hearing officer, how will the review officer's decision be considered? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
For the purposes of denying a motion for judicial review of a decision by the Board of Arbitration for Justice denying an application to review the denial of the motion, in what circumstances will the motion be reviewed? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a decision-maker delay the effective date of an adverse decision in an administrative proceeding to facilitate a judicial review? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the test for setting aside a decision by the Department of Justice to review an administrative decision? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a reconsideration decision not to be reviewed during a judicial review of an initial decision? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review for a decision at an administrative tribunal? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Can an administrative tribunal reopen, rehear or set aside its decision? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the impact of a decision-maker bypassing administrative decision-makers on a constitutional matter such as this? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Can a decision maker such as the Immigration Officer on an application for permanent residents in Canada be reviewed on a higher standard of review of patent unreasonableness? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
