Adjudicators are not always required to include a credibility analysis in their reasons: Byron v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles) 2017 BCSC 1125 at para. 71. However, an adjudicator’s reasoning process must be sufficiently transparent, and reliability of police evidence must not simply be assumed. As was stated in Rangi v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2014 BCSC 2343:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.