Does a decision to live together create a positive intention to contribute to and share in each other's assets and liabilities?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Rubin v. Gendemann, 2011 ABQB 71 (CanLII):

A decision to live together does not, without more, “create a positive intention to contribute to and share in each other’s assets and liabilities”: Shunamon v. Diegel, 2008 ABQB 291 at para. 15, 453 A.R. 199.

Other Questions


How is liability apportioned between 1/3 liability for walking quickly out of an unmarked crosswalk? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the liability of a solicitor to others than their client? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the liability of an experienced intermediate skier who, as a result of an accident on a ski lift at a ski resort, lost control of her skis as she approached the waiting point where she was required to stop before proceeding to the loading position? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a constructive trust remedy be used in circumstances where the spouse has contributed not to the acquisition but has contributed to the preservation, maintenance or improvement of the property? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the word "royalty" mean an intention to create a interest in land? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a judge override a trial judge's decision that a shared parenting arrangement is working well? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts apportioned the 80-20 split between liability and apportionment of liability in a motor vehicle accident? (Alberta, Canada)
Is Master Funduk’s position that the superior court should not give undue deference to Master's decisions? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the difference between the categories of strict liability and reasonable care in a strict liability offence? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the liability of the estate, the personal representative and the surviving spouse for funeral expenses? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.