When will standing issues arise in the context of Aboriginal rights?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Hwlitsum First Nation v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 BCSC 475 (CanLII):

He referred to the earlier case of Nemaiah Valley Indian Band v. Riverside Forest Products (1999), 37 C.P.C. (4th) 101, to differentiate between two ways standing issues may arise in the context of Aboriginal rights:

Other Questions


How has the definition of an Aboriginal right been interpreted in the context of Aboriginal rights cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a party have to prove aboriginal right or title before there is a duty to consult with the aboriginal peoples? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Respondent at the Human Rights Tribunal of B.C. claim that the Applicant be denied the right to continue to pursue his human rights claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the court considered the issue of gift/loan issue in the context of a previous gift/gift relationship? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law where the issues sought to be resolved, e.g. whether the tenant has a right of first refusal, are interminably intertwined with other issues? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any authority in aboriginal rights and title rights that can be relied upon by a collective authority? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a common issue or issue be tried in advance of individual issues? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the trial judge considered aboriginal perspective in the context of aboriginal title claims? (British Columbia, Canada)
In an aboriginal rights and title case, how have the courts considered expert evidence in aboriginal cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the Minister of Justice considered the issue of standing in the context of a motion for summary judgment? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.