An allegation of bias, actual or apprehended, against a tribunal is a serious allegation. It challenges the integrity of the tribunal and of its members who participated in the impugned decision. It cannot be done lightly. It cannot rest on mere suspicion, pure conjecture or mere impressions of an applicant or counsel. It must be supported by material evidence demonstrating conduct that derogates from the standard: Arthur v. Canada (Attorney General), 2001 FCA 223, (2001), 283 N.R. 346.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.