Can a report critiquing a section 211 report be inadmissible?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from P.G.E. v. H.R.C., 2016 BCSC 1316 (CanLII):

A report critiquing a s. 211 report prepared by another expert may not be relevant and be thus inadmissible: Hejzlar v. Mitchell-Hejzlar, 2010 BCSC 1139. In Hejzlar at para. 11, the court noted that when critiquing a s. 211 report:

Other Questions


What is the effect of section 12 of the Charter on a minimum sentence imposed under section 344(a) of the Criminal Code? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the adjudicator reviewed the officer's report, affidavits and officer’s report? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a party have to obtain a report from a doctor before obtaining the report from that doctor? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of section 29(1) of the Criminal Code Act, section 46 of the Civil Rights Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the late filing of an expert report under the BCSC's Disjunctive Expert Report Rule permit late filing? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a defendant in a personal injury action make use of a medical report and clinical report obtained from an earlier and by then settled wrongful dismissal action? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can the requirement to deliver an expert report within 84 days (or a response report in 42 days) be dispensed with? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the starting point in section 9(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b) and 9 (b) of section 9 of the Child Support Guidelines? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an applicant and respondent at a summary trial rely on expert reports, examinations for discovery, interrogatories, use of admissions, and expert reports? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a defendant have to match expert for expert and report for report? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.