Does a physician have to be liable to third parties for failing to warn a patient or regulatory authority that the patient suffers from a medical condition which may impair their ability to drive?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Zhang v. Garrison (Re), 2009 BCSC 1741 (CanLII):

The plaintiffs point to the fact that a physician may be found liable to third parties for failing to warn a patient, or a regulatory authority, that the patient suffers from a medical condition which may impair his or her ability to operate a motor vehicle: Bakker v. Van Santen, 2003 ABQD 92. They argue that if a physician may be found liable to third parties respecting a patient’s use or operation of a motor vehicle, a physician may similarly be found liable to third parties respecting a patient’s use of an aircraft.

Other Questions


Is a third party responsible for the costs of a plaintiff who alleges that one of the third parties has failed to draft specifications to clearly state that certain fireproofing is to be asbestos-free? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the law of agency apply when one party gives explicit or implicit authority to another party (the principal) to enter contracts with third parties? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a third party notice seeking contribution and indemnity from third party religious orders that were responsible for supervision and operation of residential schools? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a party be compelled to sign authorizations for the release of third party records? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a defendant be liable for the entire amount of money he received in a transaction with a third party in which he is not liable? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the factors used in assessing whether a plaintiff has suffered a loss or impairment of his capital asset, the ability to earn income? (British Columbia, Canada)
In assessing the credibility of an author, is the author’s credibility of the author? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the court in BC considered third party privacy interests in deciding whether to grant disclosure to a plaintiff's personal computer drive? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it necessary for a plaintiff to advance a future cost of care claim, in a medical malpractice action, to have a physician testify to the medical necessity of each and every item of care? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a physician or medical doctor required to testify to the medical necessity of a future care item? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.