What is the test for determining the reasonableness of a Director's decision?
Northwest Territories, Canada
The following excerpt is from A.B. v Yellowknife (City), 2014 CanLII 90874 (NT HRAP):
Based on my review of the law, an adjudicator considering the reasonableness of the Director’s decision must consider whether the Director made a decision based on reasoning that is capable of withstanding probing examination. (Diavik v. Boullard et al, at para. 60)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the Court have the authority to determine whether reasons provided by the County Subdivision and Development Appeal Board are adequate? (Northwest Territories, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a person has a right to be "arbitrarily detained or imprisoned"? (Northwest Territories, Canada)
Is Frobisher Bay's decision not to seek to restrict its authority within the limits of its authority? (Northwest Territories, Canada)
What is the applicable standard of review in a statutory appeal from an administrative tribunal or decision maker? (Northwest Territories, Canada)
Is reasonableness the applicable standard of review under s. 81.1(1) of the Health and Social Care Act? (Northwest Territories, Canada)
What is the limitation period for determining when a cause of action arose? (Northwest Territories, Canada)
What is the standard of review for the challenged decisions? (Northwest Territories, Canada)
What is the legal test for a party to be released from an undertaking? (Northwest Territories, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a person has a right to be "arbitrarily detained or imprisoned"? (Northwest Territories, Canada)
In a personal injury action, in what circumstances will counsel argue that a point at first seems key? (Northwest Territories, Canada)
