Is it significantly unfair to require the commercial section of the building’s reasonable expectations to contribute to the repair costs of the elevator?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Residential Section of The Owners, Strata Plan NW 2089 v. Commercial Section of The Owners, Strata Plan NW 2089 et al, 2019 BCCRT 1140 (CanLII):

59. As for the third part of the test, would it be a significantly unfair breach of the commercial section’s reasonable expectations if it had to contribute to the subject elevator’s repair expenses? The courts have described actions that are significantly unfair as being burdensome, harsh, wrongful, lacking in probity or fair dealing, unjust or inequitable. See Reid v. Strata Plan LMS 2503, 2003 BCCA 128.

Other Questions


What are some cases in which unequal contribution to family expenses and burdens made it significantly unfair to divide family property equally? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is considered to be a “significantly unfair” state of the law in the context of section 286 of the BCCA? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there a global discount on the cost of repairing a commercial premises? (British Columbia, Canada)
When a joint custody arrangement is in place and the 40% line has been crossed, is the joint parent required to contribute towards child care costs under s. 9 of the Child Support Guidelines? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is security for costs of an appeal cost more readily than security for trial costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for requiring an appellant to pay some costs and to post security for other costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for making a reasonable contribution from the child for educational costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is reasonable conduct in litigation reasonable enough to warrant a reduction in costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a builder and contractor be held to owe a duty to subsequent purchasers for the cost of repairing non-dangerous defects in a building? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for "significant unfairness" in section 95(2) of the Rules of Apportionation? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.