What is the threshold for a complainant to meet on a s. 27(1)(c) application?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Cardosa v. Porcupine Wood Products and others, 2014 BCHRT 129 (CanLII):
The threshold for a complainant to meet on a s. 27(1)(c) application is low. The complainant must only show that the evidence takes the case out of the realm of conjecture, Hill v. WCAT, (2011) BCCA 49, para. 27.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can an application be brought to dismiss an application under s. 27(1)(c) of the Rules of Civil Procedure Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
On an application to dismiss pursuant to section 27(1)(c), what is the burden on the complainant to establish a prima facie case? (British Columbia, Canada)
On an application to dismiss pursuant to s. 27(1)(c), what is the burden on the respondent to show that the complainant has no reasonable prospect of success? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the threshold for defeat in an application to dismiss a complaint? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there an alternative argument that the application of a law of general application to a particular group of Indians in a particular activity is legislation in their Indian-ness? (British Columbia, Canada)
On an interim support application, can the court get bogged down with the merits of the application? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an application to dismiss on an interlocutory application be dismissed? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a judge have a duty to hear an application where the adjudicator of the application has been found in error? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a complainant amend their complaint in the midst of an application to dismiss? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the threshold that a complainant must meet in a workplace injury claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
