What is the test for interpretation of section 141(3) of the Rental Restriction Act?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Mathews v. The Owners, Strata Plan VR 90, 2016 BCCA 345 (CanLII):

The question of statutory interpretation that lies at the heart of this appeal has been the subject of conflicting decisions in the court below. In Carnahan v. The Owners Strata Plan LMS522, 2014 BCSC 2375, the court held that s. 141(3) requires a strata corporation to set out in a rent restriction bylaw the criteria that will be applied in deciding whether permission to rent will be given to an owner. By contrast, a rent restriction bylaw was upheld in the case at bar even though it was silent on how the strata corporation would decide whether to grant permission to rent.

Other Questions


What is the test for overturning a chambers judge's finding that a section of statutory interpretation of the Statutory Interpretation of Section 5(1) of the Criminal Code applies to a person who is not a party to the legislation? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of section 29(1) of the Criminal Code Act, section 46 of the Civil Rights Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the case law in which a judge improperly interpreted a restrictive covenant to protect views? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have sections 6 and 7 of the Charter of Canada been interpreted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the starting point in section 9(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b) and 9 (b) of section 9 of the Child Support Guidelines? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a "deposit clause" in standard form contracts? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the rules of interpretation in the interpretation of tax legislation? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the Law Society of BC dealt with a case involving a lawyer’s attempt to avoid a restriction on his practice by concealing his non-compliance with the restriction? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a restriction on the height of a house be interpreted as "not more than one storey in height"? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the BC government's policy of not funding interpretation services for deaf patients been interpreted in conjunction with receipt of medical care? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.