There is, however, another aspect to this argument I do find persuasive. If “reasonable legal costs” under s. 118(a) means “court costs” generally assessed on a party and party basis, ss. 118(b) and (c) would be redundant because “court costs” have long included both legal fees and disbursements: Gonzales v. Voskakis, 2013 BCSC 675. As the legislature is presumed not to speak in vain, the structure of s. 118 as a whole supports a conclusion that the legislature intended “reasonable legal costs” to encompass the actual costs incurred by a strata corporation in registering and enforcing a lien against a delinquent unit owner, subject to review for reasonableness.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.